The Big Five Personality Dimensions Essay
Big Five Personality Essay
Personality. Everybody has one. It has own uniqueness, relatively stable and predictable. In facts, personality is one of our important assets that already shaped our experiences. In a study of personalities and character (Schultz, 2009) personality can be define as the unique, relatively enduring internal and external aspects of person's character that influence behavior in different situations. According to (Papalia, Olds, Feldman, 2011) the relatively consistent blend of emotions, temperament, thought and behavior that makes person unique. Such characteristics way of feeling, thinking, and acting which reflect both inborn and environment influences affect the way we adapt to the world. The number of personality has been vary between theories. These theories will help answered the question of human nature and pattern behavior. For instance, what is influence by personality as the time goes by whether traits can change from childhood until the end of our life.
Moreover, the purpose of the test that has been asking to done is to know what type of the personality not only me but people around me. Though, it can help recognize better who am I really are. In addition, I do understand people with whom am I interact, the advantage is for the future to get to know my partner, children personality. Furthermore, personality are aspects that other people can see and somewhat impression we make on others.
After done taking the test " McCrae and Costa's The Big Five Personality" five major dimensions of human personality referred as OCEAN model of personality which is Openness to experience/Intellect, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, the result show that there are differences in percentile of the five elements in the test.
Openness to experience/Intellect 24 percentile
Conscientiousness 17 percentile
Extraversion 70 percentile
Agreeableness 74 percentile
Neuroticism 32 percentile
Based on the percentile showed there are two highest marks earned. There are Extraversion 70 percentile, Agreeableness 74 percentile. The lowest marks obtained are Openness to experience/Intellect 24 percentile, Conscientiousness 17 percentile, Neuroticism 32 percentile.
We can infer based on the data obtained above that major of the elements give somewhat are truth results about my dominant personality traits. My opinion is in different situation may express different dominant personality. For instance, someone has quiet and calm traits he or she is not always express that kind of traits in every situation. Extraversion 70 percentile. Or extrovert can be interpret as a lively and confident person who enjoys...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
The Nomothetic Approach in Personality Testing1589 words - 6 pages The Nomothetic approach is an approach to personality assessment. The term comes from the Greek word "nomos" which means law. In an online dictionary homothetic is defined as "giving or establishing laws". Look for universal laws of behaviour. It is based on traditional, classical science. In psychology the nomothetic approach focuses on people in general, trying to find...
The Big Five Research Project Essay837 words - 3 pages The purpose of this report is to provide answers to the questions presented in the research project in the Rasmussen general psychology class. The first question ask was what are the five personality traits according to the prominent five factor model. According to the psychology.suite101 website (Pawlik-Kienlen, 2007) the big five personality traits are as follows: • Conscientiousness - being disciplined, dedicated and organized. This also...
Personality: Genetically Inherited or Developed988 words - 4 pages The foremost differentiation between human beings lies within an individual’s personality. A person’s personality lies in the individual’s general profile or within the unique mixture of psychological qualities of character that relates to that individuals distinctive nature. The individual’s distinctive mixture of psychological aspect guides the way in which that specific human being reacts and interacts with the others or their surroundings....
Introduction to Personality902 words - 4 pages Introduction to Personality Personality has been part of debate amongst theorists for decades. Many theories have been developed about what human personality is and how it develops. Even after so many years of research and studies, no one definition has been agreed by all theorists. This paper will briefly talk about different aspects of personality and what influence in the development of personality. A person's personality is made up...
Five factor model of personality. Refers to theories of Allport and Oddbert, McAdams, Eyesenck, Mischel, Block, Both Costa and McCrae, Goldberg and Saucier2106 words - 8 pages The precise definition of personality has been a point of discussion amongst many differenttheorists within many different disciplines since the beginning of civilisation. Personality can bedefined as 'the distinctive and characteristic patterns of thought, emotion, and behaviour that definean individual's personal style and influence his or her interactions with the environment' (Atkinson,Atkinson, Smith & Bem,...
The Five Factor Model Of Personality2064 words - 8 pages Missing Works Cited The Five Factor Model of Personality The precise definition of personality has been a point of discussion amongst many different theorists within many different disciplines since the beginning of civilization. Personality can be defined as "the distinctive and characteristic patterns of thought, emotion, and behavior that define an individual's personal style and influence his or her interactions with the...
Personality Stability and Change in Trait Theories Of Allport and Eysenck1128 words - 5 pages The evaluation of personality stability and change across the life span is largely determined by theoretical beliefs. While some scholars have a more deterministic viewpoint and consider human personality as fairly predictable and stable over time (e.g. biogenetic determinism), other theorists view personality as fluid and highly malleable (e.g. behaviorism). The intermediate stance assumes a bidirectional relationship between heredity and...
Management Principles and Practice2002 words - 8 pages Management Principles and Practice Although it is possible to adopt a fairly atheoritical, empirical approach to assessing personality, even psychologists make assumptions or have some preconceptions with regard to the expected outcome and nature of their research. Unfortunately, theories are often based on a minimum of actual observations of the objects of their efforts. At the very least, it should be recognised that some frame of...
The trait perspective and the ten personality disorders1767 words - 7 pages One of the major theoretical areas in the study of the personality is the trait perspective. It suggests that individual personalities are comprised of broad dispositions, and it identifies and measures the characteristics that they are made up of (Cherry). The trait perspective helps to identify a person’s personality type (Myers). This perspective focuses on the difference between individual personalities and the traits that shape them. A...
The Influence of Personality and Attitude on Consumers Behaviour1812 words - 7 pages Introduction Personality and attitude are both internal factors (inner characteristics) that influence a consumers’ behaviour. Research has been done on these internal factors and researchers have come to the conclusion that inner characteristics are those characteristic that distinguish one individual from another such as mannerisms. Some research implies that early childhood experiences and dual influence of genetics can have an influence on...
The Relationship of Infant Attachment Patterns to Personality Development1518 words - 6 pages PAGE PAGE 2 The Relationship of Infant Attachment Patterns to Personality DevelopmentPurposeFrom the previous study, personality development has five perspectives, they are temperament, psychoanalytic, attachment, self and observed behavior, and this study will only focus...
I was reading an excellent book recently when I came across the concept of the “Big Five” personality traits. I’d never heard of these before but I found them fascinating. You’ve probably taken personality tests in the past—the Meyers-Briggs test is a popular one. The Big Five are more often used in scientific circles for personality research, so I think they’re handy to know.
I also enjoyed reading about the implications these could have for managers or anyone in charge of groups of people (teachers, sports coaches, even parents).
I’m fairly confident everyone can benefit from understanding how the Big Five work and paying attention to the personality traits of ourselves and those around us, so I’d like to share what I’ve read about the Big Five and some suggestions for using them to your advantage.
What are the Big Five
In the 1970s, two groups of personality researchers independently came to the conclusion that most personality traits can be boiled down into five broad categories, now known as the Big Five. They are:
- Emotional stability (or Neuroticism)
I first read about these in an essay by Geoffrey Miller in the book I mentioned earlier. He explained that each of these traits acts like a scale, where everyone falls at some points along the scale between high and low. I’ve actually written about the scale of extraversion and introversion before, but I didn’t realize at the time that it was part of the Big Five lineup.
If you’re curious about these, you can try this online test to see how you score. Here’s what my results looked like (though I’m not so sure I believe this is me!):
Another essay in the same book, by Helen Fisher, explored “Temperament dimensions,” which are very similar broad categories to those above, excluding extraversion. One important note to make about both of these models of describing personality traits is that they are very broad, general categories. They came from patterns that emerged from large amounts of research data, so they can’t pinpoint your exact personality. They can be used as a helpful guide, but not a hard-and-fast rule set.
Let’s explore how each trait presents itself in our personalities:
Openness: Those who score high for this trait tend to enjoy adventure and be open to new experiences
Conscientiousness: High scorers for conscientiousness are generally organized and dependable
Extraversion: Those who are high on this scale draw their energy from being around others, so they tend to be more sociable (not to be confused with outgoing!)—read more about this trait in my previous post.
Agreeableness: High scorers for this trait are often trusting, helpful and compassionate.
Emotional stability: People with high scores for this trait are usually confident and don’t tend to worry often (this may be tested as neuroticism, in which case high scorers would be prone to worrying and anxiety).
Geoffrey Miller’s essay emphasized how each of these works as a scale, or really a bell curve, with all of us falling into the range somewhere. I loved this point he made, which really put things into perspective for me:
One implication is that the “insane” are often just a bit more extreme in their personalities than whatever promotes success or contentment in modern societies—or more extreme than we’re comfortable with.
Although these traits are genetically heritable and mostly stable throughout our lives, Helen Fisher’s essay emphasized the fact that people are malleable:
We are not puppets on a string of DNA.
Thus, if you tend to score high on a trait you’re not especially keen on, you can work on this. It takes work, though. Helen also made the point that while we are capable of acting “out of character,” this is exhausting and we can’t keep it up for long. Small increments are generally best to create lasting change.
Now that we understand what the Big Five are and how they present in people, let’s take a look at why this information is useful to us.
Again, Helen Fisher has an excellent point to make on this:
… we are social creatures, and a deeper understanding of who we (and others) are can provide a valuable tool for understanding, pleasing, cajoling, reprimanding, rewarding, and loving others.
I couldn’t agree more. In particular, I think this information can help us to understand and help our employees even better.
Building a better team using personality traits
Whether you’re looking for a way to build a more cohesive team with the people you already manage or you’re hiring, like Buffer, you can put these personality traits to work if you understand them well.
1. Take note of the personality traits you need before hiring
Before you hire for a new role, you’ll probably put together a job description. This helps you to understand what kind of person you’re looking for: what skills and experience they’ll have, and what they’ll be able to bring to your company.
Using the Big Five, you can put together a rough blueprint of the personalities you already have in your team and make a note of which personality traits would best fit into the new role.
2. Look for personalities that will fit into and compliment your company culture
We’re big on culture at Buffer, and this is something I think we could add into our hiring process to make even better decisions about who will fit in best.
Understanding the personality traits that suit the role you’re hiring for is important, but how personalities fit together can make a big difference as well. Working out the personality traits most suited to your company’s culture can help you to keep an eye out for them and spot people who will fit in more easily.
3. Pair new employees up with team members who suit their personality type
When new employees come on board it’s fairly standard for an existing employee to show them the ropes. If you’re buddying up new employees for a while, taking personality types into consideration could make your employee on boarding process smoother.
Do you have any other suggestions for using personality types in hiring or bringing your team together? Let us know in the comments.
P.S. If you liked this post, you might also like Why positive encouragement works better than criticism, according to science and 22 Tips To Better Care for Introverts and Extroverts.
Image credit: Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience