Progressive Vs Traditional Education Essay Sample
Progressive Education Essay
1318 Words6 Pages
John Keating, a student at Welton Academy inspired his fellow classmates, to meet in caves and read challenging poetry of the past, not with flashcards, but with these words, “Now, my class, you will learn to think for yourselves again. You will learn to savor words and language. No matter what anybody tells you, words and ideas can change the world.” Typically, students do not hear enough of this type of passion in a traditional classroom. However, a progressive classroom, be it a cave or college can inspire students to memorize facts, not because they have to, but rather because they want to for the betterment of humanity. Society desperately needs students educated in a progressive style because America needs students who realize…show more content…
Educational philosopher, Marie Montessori was a strong advocate for such learning, particularly for children under age three who have a strong interest in learning through the use of movement and verbal play (So what's Montessori and Piaget?).
John Dewey, another educational philosopher believed “Education is a social process. Education is growth. Education is, not a preparation for life; education is life itself.” (Inc.) He felt that learning took place only when students had internalized what they had gained through experience and practiced it in their own lives. In a progressive classroom, the teacher designs experiences for students with the idea that through experience, students build knowledge and skills. A society of individuals conforming to studying flashcards may be good, but a society of literate individuals consciously aware of why and how the facts on the flashcards and in mass media can solve new problems is better.
A progressive classroom looks different, and a progressive teacher inspires unique thinking in individual students differently, as well. Instead of being strict with a set curriculum and specific subject to cover, teachers find their students’ present interests, abilities, and needs. Developing individualized education plans based on student interests and
Differences Between Traditional and Progressive Education
This chart, from Independent Schools, a magazine of the National Association of Independent Schools, is a helpful guide in understanding the differences between traditional and constructivist/progressive education. We think the description of progressive education in this chart is a good description of the approach that teachers strive for at Wingra School.
School is a preparation for life.
School is a part of life.
Learners are passive absorbers of information and authority.
Learners are active participants, problem solvers, and planners.
Teachers are sources of information and authority.
Teachers are facilitators, guides who foster thinking.
Parents are outsiders and uninvolved.
Parents are the primary teachers, goal setters, and planners, and serve as resources.
Community is separate from school, except for funding.
Community is an extension of the classroom.
Decision-making is centrally based and administratively delivered.
Decision-making is shared by all constituent groups.
Program is determined by external criteria, particularly test results.
Program is determined by mission, philosophy, and goals for graduates.
Learning is linear, with factual accumulation and skill mastery.
Learning is spiral, with depth and breadth as goals.
Knowledge is absorbed through lectures, worksheets, and texts.
Knowledge is constructed through play, direct experience, and social interaction.
Instruction is linear and largely based on correct answers.
Instruction is related to central questions and inquiry, often generated by the children.
Disciplines, particularly language and math, are separated.
Disciplines are integrated as children make connections.
Skills are taught discretely and are viewed as goals.
Skills are related to content and are viewed as tools.
Assessment is norm-referenced, external, and graded.
Assessment is benchmarked, has many forms, and is progress-oriented.
Success is competitively based, derived from recall and memory, and specific to a time/place.
Success is determined through application over time, through collaboration.
Products are the end point.
Products are subsumed by process considerations.
Intelligence is a measure of linguistic and logical/mathematical abilities.
Intelligence is recognized as varied, includes the arts, and is measured in real-life problem-solving.
School is a task to be endured.
School is a challenging and fun part of life.
Source: Robert G. Peters, with thanks to the books Schools of Quality, by John Jay Bonstigl, and In Search of Understanding, by Martin C. Brooks and Jaqueline Grennon, Independent Schools.
Published by the National Association of Independent Schools. Reprinted with permission.
Banner photo by Colleen Pardun Photography